Catch You Later was said to be a thriller where Lark and Mikki were each other’s whole world in their small, dead-end town. Working the night shift at a highway travel stop was hardly glamorous, but they were in it together. Until a stranger rolled through, and Mikki made the impulsive decision to leave with him. She was never seen again.
Now, eight years later, Lark has rebuilt her life as best as she can. Raising her young daughter and caring for Mikki’s grandma, and even getting engaged to a kind highway patrol officer. But when the same stranger who took Mikki returns, asking for her, old wounds are ripped open.
With the search reignited, Lark is desperate to uncover the truth. Did Mikki really disappear, or has she been hiding all along? Following the trail could risk everything Lark has left—but she may have no choice.
Pin this for later
Get the book from Amazon
This is an affiliate link. I earn from qualifying purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you
My Review of Catch You Later
Why I Picked Up Catch You Later
I wanted to read a thriller after reading so many feel-good beach reads. Reading the blurb, I thought this might inject some adrenaline into my blood. A woman who said – Catch You Later – then disappeared into the sunset had the theme of missing person written all over it. Friendship embedded in a story was something I valued in a book. I was keen to explore the dual emotions of desperation to find a friend Mikkie and the deep bond of friendship.
Though I didn’t like the cover, but the title more than made up for it.
Themes, Plot, Writing
The plot arc of a Missing Person was done up well, where the writing left hints of how much Mikki would regret this decision of leaving her workplace with a stranger and how Lark would spend years cursing herself for not having done enough to stop her best friend. I loved the crumbs the author left at the end of each chapter initially. They pulled me right into the story.
Written in dual timeframes of 2016 and 2024, I could get to see the story from both their eyes, which was a good point and a strong way to build curiosity in a reader. Then the story drifted away from the main theme with pages and pages of narration and nary a dialogue to break the monotony. How much could one read about Lark’s thoughts on the same topic?
On the other hand, Mikki’s conversations with the stranger who drove her away from the drudge that her life was nothing great. There was an attempt to add an air of mystery to the whole escapade, but the writing didn’t pull me in. No strength in the words, where most of them didn’t project the right imagery needed for a thriller.
Now, how would one end such a book with dual timelines which had left the theme of a thriller far behind and become more like a contemporary novel? You guessed it right. A predictable way.
Strengths
The initial few chapters of Catch You Later had a strong feeling of suspense and the atmosphere of impending danger. I had visions of Mikki being chained in a dark cellar. The words written in the prose appeared to have a darker connotation. The chapters that most retail sites allowed a reader to download as a sample were done well. Almost suspenseful, evoking sympathy for the girls they were and the women they would soon become.
But then…
Weaknesses
OMG. Too many to talk about in detail. I would say the decision to move away from a suspense and make it a literary fiction almost contemporary in its tone pulled me down completely. Many attempts were made to cast doubt on Lark’s testimony to the cops. But believe me, they were flimsy at best. I failed to understand why a small lie, which didn’t have anything to do with what happened to Mikki after she rode off with a stranger, became the cause of so much doubt. Even her fiance was on the verge of breaking up. There were many such lines which would work in a true thriller. But pages of rumination by Lark especially killed my enthusiasm for the book. It forced me to skim read, and even that took 5 days.
I went through the blurb after reading the book and realized it left hints of a suspenseful thriller. But on analyzing the individual words, I realized the beauty of it. There was actually no suspense in it, just left readers feeling there was a missing person story in it. Adding the author’s bio with book titles – all of which appeared to be thrillers – made me feel this book was one too.
But that was marketing. And not really what was in the actual book. Boring as heck was what I thought the book was.
Conclusion And Recommendation
Getting the book free? Read it if you don’t have any other books. Buying the book? Forget it, there are better ones in the market. Not a book I would recommend. Keeping it to 2 stars
Have you read this book? Did you like it? Let me know in comments.
Ever read a ‘thriller’ that left you anything but thrilled?
Avoid the missteps that can turn a thriller into a bore. Learn what NOT to do while writing suspense, and get tips to avoid these pitfalls in your own manuscript. Explore my beta-reading services to elevate your story into the genre it purports to be.
MY TOP POSTS
Stay connected outside my social media with my weekly Newsletter – Digital Content Pages
My introducer post – check out why I chose Showit as my website builder here
Use my code DCP to get one 1.5 months free on Showit
Get all the resources for your social media and digital marketing without breaking the bank from my DCP Shop here
Pin this for later